Review Guide

Review Protocol and Evaluation Criteria

General Introduction

Our goal: to provide you with thoroughly documented reviews and articles to help you form a reliable and independent opinion about a wide variety of products, programs, services, or topics (health, beauty, food, sports, wellness, weight loss, IT, relationships, animals, fashion, DIY, etc.).

Since 2012, more than 1,800 reviews have been published according to a demanding methodology, with a single aim: transparency and usefulness for the consumer.

We do not accept any payment for our reviews. Everything is offered free of charge, without sponsorship or commissioned content. Our financial independence relies solely on affiliation and advertising (learn more).

Our Mission

We inform our readers about:

• A wide variety of programs, products, or services, both new and existing;
• The features, functions, ingredients, benefits, drawbacks, quality, reputation, and instructions for use of each offer;
• Similar products, credible alternatives, and comparative reports;
• Legal actions, scams, product recalls, or regulatory alerts;
• Dozens to thousands of testimonials and consumer feedback.

Our Research and Verification Protocol

Our articles are produced by a multidisciplinary team (health, sports, IT, wellness, etc.), according to a strict protocol guaranteeing in-depth analysis and impartiality.

Our approach:

• Thorough review of terms and conditions, privacy policies, and legal notices.
• Research and validation of authenticated consumer feedback (Trustpilot, Verified Reviews, Google Reviews, etc.).
• Analysis of commercial tactics used on the website and sales pages.
• Simulation of the purchase process to detect hidden fees or misleading practices.
• Verification of actual return and refund rates.
• Strict exclusion of unauthenticated or abusive reviews.
• No subjectivity: no personal opinion in our conclusions.
• Caution with information provided by the seller, always cross-checked.
• Systematic proofreading: each article is validated by one of our expert consultants in the relevant field, then reviewed by René Ronse before publication.

This protocol ensures structured, impartial, and factual information, truly useful for every reader.

Editorial Criteria (Writing Methodology)

For every publication:

• Respect for editorial neutrality (no subjective opinions).
• Clear, structured, and concise presentation.
• Rigorous citation of sources (official website, review platforms, regulatory alerts, etc.).
• Thorough spelling and grammar check.
• Rejection of any content automatically generated without human validation (no “AI-only” content).
• Only one publication per week, to prioritize quality over quantity. [1]

Article Structure

1. Technical Sheet

• Product/service name, company, author/person in charge, official website, available languages, brief description, price, format, delivery method, guarantees.

2. Description

• Detailed and neutral presentation in one or two sentences.

3. Evaluation

• Background, features, usage/dosage, benefits.
• Practical information: delivery, support, payment, promo codes, etc.

4. Drawbacks

• List of main disadvantages or recurring criticisms according to testimonials, including contraindications and side effects.

5. Reputation

• Summary of user experience (testimonials collected from multiple platforms).

6. Conclusion

• Impartial summary of all points.
• Color code:
  

  Green Code: Recommended Product!

  Yellow Code: Requires Attention!

  Red Code: Not Recommended Product!

Ethical Commitments & Independence

To ensure transparency and reliability of our content, we apply strict ethical principles and defend absolute independence:

• No sponsored articles, no seller compensation, no conflict of interest.
• Strict respect for user confidentiality.
• Regular updates of reviews according to reader feedback or new data.
• For any doubts or questions, contact us via the contact page.

In Summary

Our approach is based on rigor, transparency, neutrality, and usefulness.
Every published article is the result of a documented, verified, and constantly updated process — so that your trust remains our priority.

Guidelines for Testimonials and Comments

Our ambition is to make testimonials a real tool for mutual support: each review should guide and protect consumers in their choices. To build a constructive and reliable community, we have defined clear rules regarding comment publication:

• Objective: to help the community with honest, useful, and constructive testimonials.
• Strict moderation: rejection of hate speech, defamation, plagiarism, self-promotion, distortion, or excessive anger. [2]
• Verification: possibility of requesting proof (order number) to authenticate a review.
• Removal/modification: possible for useless, off-topic, personal, incomprehensible, or improperly formatted comments (language, SMS, all caps, spelling errors, etc.).
• Manual publication: every review is read and filtered before publication.
• Limit: if a thread exceeds 50 comments, only new serious and useful testimonials are accepted.
• Correction: if an inappropriate comment slips through, any visitor can report it via the contact form.

Notes

• Note 1: We do not use AI without human oversight to write analyses: each article is written and validated manually, which explains the deliberately limited pace of one publication per week.
• Note 2: Modifications to comments relate only to form (spelling, clarity, format); we never alter the substance or the associated rating.